Miguna Miguna Defends Oketch Salah, Says Raila Odinga Is the One Who Should Be Questioned

Controversial lawyer and political activist Miguna Miguna has weighed in on the heated debate surrounding recent attacks on Oketch Salah, describing the criticism directed at the outspoken commentator as misplaced. Miguna argued that those angered by Salah’s remarks are directing their frustration at the wrong person and should instead be questioning the late Raila Odinga’s political legacy and decisions.

In a strongly worded statement shared on social media, Miguna maintained that Oketch Salah merely voiced opinions that reflect long-standing concerns within sections of the Kenyan public. According to Miguna, attacking Salah personally is an attempt to silence debate rather than engage with the substance of the issues raised. He emphasized that public discourse should focus on accountability and historical political decisions, not on demonizing individuals for expressing dissenting views.

Miguna pointed out that Raila Odinga, as one of Kenya’s most influential political figures over several decades, played a central role in shaping the country’s opposition politics and reform agenda. He argued that any serious national conversation about political failures, unmet promises, or stalled reforms must inevitably examine Raila’s leadership choices and strategies. In Miguna’s view, shielding powerful figures from scrutiny while targeting commentators is intellectually dishonest.

The lawyer further accused Raila’s loyalists of fostering a culture where criticism is treated as betrayal. He noted that such intolerance undermines democratic values and discourages open discussion. Miguna insisted that Kenya’s political maturity depends on the ability of citizens to question even the most revered leaders without fear of backlash or character assassination.

Miguna also defended Oketch Salah’s right to free expression, stating that disagreement should be met with counter-arguments, not insults or threats. He described Salah as a citizen engaging in political commentary, a role protected by the Constitution. According to Miguna, the hostility directed at Salah reveals deeper frustrations within political camps that are unwilling to confront uncomfortable truths about their past and present leadership.

The remarks have sparked fresh debate online, with Kenyans sharply divided. Supporters of Miguna and Salah echoed the call for honest reflection on Raila Odinga’s political journey, arguing that hero worship has hindered objective assessment of leadership outcomes. They contend that Kenya cannot move forward if its politics remain trapped in personalities rather than principles.

On the other hand, Raila Odinga’s allies dismissed Miguna’s comments as provocative and disrespectful. Some accused him of exploiting sensitive political sentiments to remain relevant, while others defended Raila’s legacy as one defined by sacrifice, resistance, and the fight for multiparty democracy. They argue that blaming Raila for current frustrations ignores the broader systemic challenges facing the country.

Despite the backlash, Miguna stood firm, reiterating that accountability should not end with current office holders alone. He stressed that past leaders must also be evaluated honestly if Kenya is to learn from its history. In his closing remarks, Miguna urged Kenyans to resist emotional reactions and instead engage in sober, fact-based discussions about leadership and responsibility.

The exchange has once again highlighted the deep fault lines in Kenya’s political discourse. As the country grapples with economic pressures and governance concerns, voices like Miguna’s continue to challenge established narratives. Whether one agrees with him or not, his intervention has reignited a crucial conversation about free speech, political accountability, and the courage to question even the most dominant figures in Kenya’s political history.