In a statement that quickly sparked debate online, Salasya said ODM is at a critical crossroads and must strengthen internal cohesion to remain relevant and faithful to its founding ideals.
He identified Winnie Odinga and Sifuna as two key figures who can help stabilize the party at a time of rising political realignments, internal pressure, and shifting alliances.
According to Salasya, Sifuna’s firm stance on party discipline, constitutionalism, and accountability, combined with Winnie Odinga’s growing influence and strong connection to the party’s core support base, could offer ODM a balanced leadership voice.
He said such a partnership would resonate with both young voters seeking change and long-time supporters who value the party’s historical mission.
“ODM must be protected from internal divisions and external interference,” Salasya said, warning that personal ambitions should not be allowed to weaken party structures ahead of future political contests.
He argued that political parties only survive when leaders put collective goals above individual interests.
His remarks come at a time when ODM is facing intense public scrutiny over its political direction, especially following recent cooperation agreements and shifting alliances at the national level.
Supporters and critics alike have questioned whether the party is still firmly rooted in its reformist principles or gradually drifting toward political convenience.
Salasya’s message reflects growing anxiety among younger politicians who fear that internal wrangles and unclear direction could weaken ODM’s appeal to a youthful electorate.
He insisted that young leaders must take responsibility for protecting the party from fragmentation and ensuring it remains democratic and people-centered.
While Winnie Odinga has not publicly responded to Salasya’s call, the statement has triggered mixed reactions across social media.
Some ODM supporters welcomed the idea of collaboration between young leaders, seeing it as an opportunity to refresh the party and prepare it for future challenges.
They argued that unity among emerging leaders is necessary to bridge the gap between old political traditions and modern expectations.
Others, however, dismissed Salasya’s remarks as unnecessary interference in internal party affairs, saying leadership relationships should develop naturally rather than through public pressure.
Some critics also questioned whether public calls for unity could mask deeper power struggles within the party.
Edwin Sifuna, who has consistently defended ODM’s independence and internal democracy, has repeatedly stated that the party must remain accountable to its supporters and guided by clear principles, not political convenience.
No comments:
Post a Comment