The driver allegedly claimed to have worked for Classic Bus for eight years.
Other employees stated that they had never seen Githinji operate a bus during that period.
Staff members expressed surprise when the news report about Githinji’s activity emerged.
He was reportedly not present in the official workgroups of Classic Bus employees.
Githinji was also absent from the company’s workers’ association.
Employees maintained regular contact within their groups and found no evidence of his participation in operations.
The revelation created confusion regarding the accuracy of public claims about his employment.
The statements came from internal sources familiar with Classic Bus operations.
The anonymity of the source protected them from potential backlash within the company.
Management records were reportedly under review to verify employment and operational claims.
Other drivers corroborated the absence of Githinji in daily duties.
The matter attracted attention on social media following the news report.
Discussions focused on verification of employment and the need for transparency in the company.
Classic Bus had not issued an official statement regarding the claims.
Internal staff continued sharing observations concerning unusual reports about colleagues.
The situation highlighted concerns over record-keeping within the organization.
No disciplinary action against Githinji had been reported.
The case emphasized the importance of accurate reporting in transport employment.
Employees and external audiences continued monitoring the situation.
Public interest remained high due to the unusual discrepancy in claims.
Internal records underwent continued scrutiny to ensure clarity.
Staff maintained coordination to track anomalies in employment information.
The incident revealed gaps in information management and underscored the need for transparency in operational records.
Hello, my name is Yoruba. I'm a 25 year old self-employed blogger from the Africa.
No comments:
Post a Comment