Speaking on the unfolding dispute, Otiende disclosed that he, Timothy Bosire, and Ruth Odinga were the only members of the National Executive Committee who opposed the decision during a meeting held in Mombasa.
Otiende criticized the move as “unprocedural, improper and illegal,” warning that it risks undermining party unity and credibility at a critical political moment.
He revealed that he had earlier cautioned Oburu Oginga against pursuing the agenda, both privately and during prior consultations, but his advice was not heeded.
The legislator expressed concern that the manner in which the decision was handled could deepen divisions within ODM, especially as the party navigates internal reforms and prepares for future political contests.
He questioned whether the removal of Sifuna had achieved any constructive outcome, arguing instead that it had exposed fractures within the party’s leadership.
Despite the tensions, Otiende reaffirmed his loyalty to the vision of Raila Odinga and the broader ideals of ODM, distancing himself from emerging factions within the party.
He emphasized that his stance is rooted in protecting institutional integrity rather than aligning with any particular camp.
The controversy highlights growing internal struggles within ODM, with competing interests shaping debates around leadership, succession, and party direction.
Observers note that such divisions, if left unresolved, could weaken the party’s cohesion ahead of the 2027 elections.
Otiende warned that ignoring internal dissent and procedural concerns may erode trust among members and supporters.
He urged party leaders to embrace inclusivity and dialogue, stressing that unity remains essential for ODM’s long-term political strength.
Hello, my name is Yoruba. I'm a 25 year old self-employed blogger from the Africa.
No comments:
Post a Comment