Speaking candidly, Jalang’o urged critics to adopt perspective and fairness, reminding Kenyans that former President Daniel arap Moi ruled for 24 years while former President Uhuru Kenyatta served for 10 — yet neither administration managed to solve all of Kenya’s persistent socio-economic challenges.
“It is about getting the opportunity to represent people better,” Jalang’o stated, adding that Ruto should be given time to implement his policies before harsh judgments are made.
His comments come amid heightened scrutiny over economic issues, taxation, and the rising cost of living.
Notably, Jalang’o’s defense of Ruto is striking given his background as an ODM legislator, a party traditionally in opposition to the government.
His stance reflects a growing trend among some opposition figures who advocate for constructive engagement rather than constant confrontation.
Jalang’o emphasized that expecting immediate solutions ignores the structural and historical nature of Kenya’s long-standing problems.
By invoking Moi’s 24-year tenure and Uhuru’s decade in office, he sought to contextualize governance as a gradual process rather than a quick fix.
Critics, however, insist that administrations must be held accountable in real time, arguing that campaign promises create expectations that citizens are entitled to evaluate continuously.
Political analysts note that Jalang’o’s remarks underscore a key reality of leadership: it is a marathon, not a sprint.
Critics, however, insist that administrations must be held accountable in real time, arguing that campaign promises create expectations that citizens are entitled to evaluate continuously.
Political analysts note that Jalang’o’s remarks underscore a key reality of leadership: it is a marathon, not a sprint.
His defense of Ruto also signals that Kenya’s political landscape remains fluid, with shifting alliances and pragmatism increasingly shaping the strategies of politicians across party lines.
No comments:
Post a Comment